Howard v. Springer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Howard v. Springer

41 A.D.3d 848, 837 N.Y.S.2d 574

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 A.D.3d 848 (Howard v. Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Springer, 41 A.D.3d 848, 837 N.Y.S.2d 574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Gartner, S.M.), dated October 13, 2006, which denied her application for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation and an award of arrears.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother appeals from the denial of her application for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation and an award of arrears. However, the record is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, and thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see Nakyeoung Seoung v Vicuna, 38 AD3d 734 [2007]). Farticularly, the mother failed to provide a transcript of the court proceeding which resulted in the denial of her application, or any of the evidence offered or considered by the court at that time. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Lifson and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Gartner, S.M.), dated October 13, 2006, which denied her application for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation and an award of arrears.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother appeals from the denial of her application for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation and an award of arrears. However, the record is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, and thus, the appeal must be dismissed (see Nakyeoung Seoung v Vicuna, 38 AD3d 734 [2007]). Farticularly, the mother failed to provide a transcript of the court proceeding which resulted in the denial of her application, or any of the evidence offered or considered by the court at that time. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Lifson and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 848, 837 N.Y.S.2d 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-springer-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack