Nakwosas v. Western Paper Stock Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Nakwosas v. Western Paper Stock Co.

272 Ill. 138

DecidedFebruary 16, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 272 Ill. 138 (Nakwosas v. Western Paper Stock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nakwosas v. Western Paper Stock Co., 272 Ill. 138 (Ill. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Cooke

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case has been before this court on appeal from a former judgment which was reversed. (Nakwosas v. Western Paper Stock Co. 260 Ill. 172.) The single question is presented whether the Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911 (Laws of 1911, p. 315,) was passed by the General Assembly in accordance with the requirements of the constitution. The objection made is, that the journals of the senate and the house of representatives fail to show that twenty-three amendments which were adopted by the house and appear in the enrolled bill were printed before the vote was taken on the final passage of the bill, as required by section 13 of article 4 of the constitution. The superior court of Cook county held that the act had been properly passed in accordance with the provisions of the constitution and entered judgment accordingly.

This same question on the same proof arose and was determined contrary to the contention of the appellant in Dragovich v. Iroquois Iron Co. 269 Ill. 478. The writer was not able at that time to absent to the view of the majority and is not now in accord with that view, but the Dragovich case definitely determines the matter, and for the reasons there given the judgment of the superior court must be affirmed.

med. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Cooke

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case has been before this court on appeal from a former judgment which was reversed. (Nakwosas v. Western Paper Stock Co. 260 Ill. 172.) The single question is presented whether the Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911 (Laws of 1911, p. 315,) was passed by the General Assembly in accordance with the requirements of the constitution. The objection made is, that the journals of the senate and the house of representatives fail to show that twenty-three amendments which were adopted by the house and appear in the enrolled bill were printed before the vote was taken on the final passage of the bill, as required by section 13 of article 4 of the constitution. The superior court of Cook county held that the act had been properly passed in accordance with the provisions of the constitution and entered judgment accordingly.

This same question on the same proof arose and was determined contrary to the contention of the appellant in Dragovich v. Iroquois Iron Co. 269 Ill. 478. The writer was not able at that time to absent to the view of the majority and is not now in accord with that view, but the Dragovich case definitely determines the matter, and for the reasons there given the judgment of the superior court must be affirmed.

med. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 Ill. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nakwosas-v-western-paper-stock-co-ill-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack