Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nairn v. State

Nairn v. State

816 So. 2d 220, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6271, 2002 WL 925043
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nairn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 837 So. 2d 519 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2002·No. No. 1D01-1693·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Russell v. State, 740 So.2d 567, 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure require a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel to be filed “in the appellate court that handled the direct appeal”); Johnson v. State, 694 So.2d 159, 159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Oakley v. State, 677 So.2d 879, 880 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Dinkins v. State, 600 So.2d 1295, 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 543 So.2d 316, 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Even if the trial court had transferred the petition, in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(b)(1), the petition failed to state any basis for relief.

WOLF, KAHN, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nairn v. State, 816 So. 2d 220, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6271, 2002 WL 925043 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

816 So. 2d 220 (Nairn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oakley v. State
677 So. 2d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Johnson v. State
694 So. 2d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Russell v. State
740 So. 2d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Smith v. State
543 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Dinkins v. State
600 So. 2d 1295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)