Dinkins v. State

600 So. 2d 1295, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6795, 1992 WL 140979
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1992·No. No. 91-3910·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a petition for writ of ha-beas corpus in the circuit court alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The circuit court denied the petition and appellant took this appeal. The proper method by which to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is by petition for writ of habeas corpus directed to the appellate court which considered the direct appeal.. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981). Because appellant filed his petition in circuit court, the order denying his petition was proper. We therefore affirm the order on appeal without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief in the proper forum.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dinkins v. State, 600 So. 2d 1295, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6795, 1992 WL 140979 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 1295 (Dinkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Crosby
335 F.3d 1303 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Nairn v. State
816 So. 2d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)