Nagle v. Conard
86 A. 1103, 80 N.J. Eq. 253, 10 Buchanan 253, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nagle v. Conard. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 N.J. Eq. 252 →
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Howell.
' For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Ykedenburgei, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy—15.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nagle v. Conard, 86 A. 1103, 80 N.J. Eq. 253, 10 Buchanan 253, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 369 (N.J. 1912).
86 A. 1103 (Nagle v. Conard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.