Nagle v. Conard
87 A. 1119, 80 N.J. Eq. 252, 10 Buchanan 252, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 377
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.
For affirmance—The Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy—15.
For reversal—Eone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nagle v. Conard, 87 A. 1119, 80 N.J. Eq. 252, 10 Buchanan 252, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 377 (N.J. 1912).
87 A. 1119 (Nagle v. Conard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lawes v. Lynch
72 A.2d 414 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Browning v. Browning
7 A.2d 816 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Mueller v. Morrell
163 A. 901 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Nagle v. Conard
96 N.J. Eq. 61 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)