Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank

2009 Ohio 3451

Opinion

[Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2009-Ohio-3451.]

NAGEL, APPELLEE, v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT. [Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2009-Ohio-3451.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2008-2501 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided July 21, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 90662, 179 Ohio App.3d 126, 2008-Ohio-5741. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Patrick J. Perotti; and Brian G. Ruschel, for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Jennifer T. Mills, and L. Bradfield Hughes, for appellant. ______________________