Nagel v. Huntington National Bank

910 N.E.2d 1037, 122 Ohio St. 3d 1227
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 21, 2009
DocketNo. 2008-2501
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 910 N.E.2d 1037 (Nagel v. Huntington National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nagel v. Huntington National Bank, 910 N.E.2d 1037, 122 Ohio St. 3d 1227 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank
2009 Ohio 3451 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
910 N.E.2d 1037, 122 Ohio St. 3d 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagel-v-huntington-national-bank-ohio-2009.