Nagel v. Huntington National Bank

910 N.E.2d 1037, 122 Ohio St. 3d 1227

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 2009·No. No. 2008-2501·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nagel v. Huntington National Bank, 910 N.E.2d 1037, 122 Ohio St. 3d 1227 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

910 N.E.2d 1037 (Nagel v. Huntington National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.