Nabozny v. State

163 So. 2d 765, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1964·No. No. 4390·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alphonse Nabozny appeals an order denying his motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The State has filed a motion to quash this appeal on the ground that the petitioner is no longer in custody of the Division of Corrections, which appears to be true. The motion therefore is well founded. The relief contemplated by Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 applies only to prisoners “in custody” under sentence of a court established by the laws of Florida. See Frappied v. State, Fla.App., 163 So.2d 502 (2nd Dist.).

Motion to quash granted.

SMITH, C. J„ and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nabozny v. State, 163 So. 2d 765, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

163 So. 2d 765 (Nabozny v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
191 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Bryant v. State
174 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
McCormick v. State
164 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)