Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Frappied v. State

Frappied v. State

163 So. 2d 502, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4197
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 1, 1964·No. No. 4481·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order here appealed, denying appellant’s claim for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, must be reversed and the causé remanded for consideration in light of this court’s decision and opinion in Caminita v. State, Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 921, filed some months after entry of the order in this cause.

The text of the appealed order and the scant record in this court intimate that appellant may, in fact, not be in custody under a sentence of the lower court. If, after the hearing necessary upon remand of the cause, this should be shown to be true, relief under Rule No. 1 in the court below would not be available.

Reversed and remanded.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frappied v. State, 163 So. 2d 502, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

163 So. 2d 502 (Frappied v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hyder v. State
214 So. 2d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Davis v. State
191 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Bryant v. State
174 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Barnes v. State
173 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
McCormick v. State
164 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Nabozny v. State
163 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)