Nabkey v. 61st Dist. Ct.

865 F.2d 259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17398, 1988 WL 135850
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1988
Docket88-2180
StatusUnpublished

This text of 865 F.2d 259 (Nabkey v. 61st Dist. Ct.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nabkey v. 61st Dist. Ct., 865 F.2d 259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17398, 1988 WL 135850 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

865 F.2d 259

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
L. Lea NABKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
61ST DIST. CT., Legal Aid Society of Western, Michigan,
Acting Judge Patrick McCauley, Stuart Hoffius, Mark Gleason,
Ben Rosa, Cal Fein, George Bolhouse; Joanne Stearns, Peter
Douse, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-2180.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1988.

Before MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges; and RICHARD SUHRHEINRICH, District Judge.*

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the file indicates that appellant appealed on November 15, 1988, from the October 17, 1988, order and the failure of the district court to rule on the October 27, 1988 motion to set aside orders dated October 17, 18 and 19. The motion to set aside was denied by order entered November 7, 1988.

This court lacks jurisdiction. No final district court decision has been entered in the case nor has an order been certified for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 434 F.2d 619, 620 (6th Cir.1970) (per curiam); William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam); Oak Constr. Co. v. Huron Cement Co., 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam). An order denying a motion to disqualify the judge is not immediately appealable. In re City of Detroit, 828 F.2d 1160, 1165 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam); City of Cleveland v. Krupansky, 619 F.2d 576, 578 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834 (1980).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Richard Suhrheinrich, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis D. Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc.
434 F.2d 619 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)
Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company
475 F.2d 1220 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States
575 F.2d 101 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
City of Cleveland v. Krupansky
619 F.2d 576 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F.2d 259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17398, 1988 WL 135850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nabkey-v-61st-dist-ct-ca6-1988.