William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States

575 F.2d 101, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5147, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11185
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1978
Docket76-2367
StatusPublished
Cited by119 cases

This text of 575 F.2d 101 (William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5147, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11185 (6th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the United States but not adjudicating the liability of other defendants. Despite the clear language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and several equally clear holdings of this Court, appellant neither sought nor received a Rule 54(b) certification that the order in question was a final judgment. Therefore, there was no final decision in terms of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and this Court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Balsbaugh v. City of Westland, 458 F.2d 1358 (6th Cir. 1972); Partin v. Hassan Motors, Inc., 363 F.2d 104 (6th Cir. 1966); Gabbard v. Rose, 330 F.2d 705 (6th Cir. 1964).

Since, however, a Rule 54(b) certification appears to be appropriate in this case, if appellant is able to obtain such from the district court within thirty days of the date of filing of this opinion, the appeal will be reinstated by the clerk, after appropriate notice of appeal and other jurisdictional prerequisites, for prompt disposition by this panel without additional briefing or oral argument.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozar v. Birds Eye Foods, Inc.
678 F. Supp. 2d 589 (W.D. Michigan, 2009)
Jones v. PRAMSTALLER
678 F. Supp. 2d 609 (W.D. Michigan, 2009)
Griffin v. Reznick
609 F. Supp. 2d 695 (W.D. Michigan, 2008)
Schoonover v. Black Bros. Co.
914 F.2d 258 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Graves
911 F.2d 734 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Avemco Ins. Co. v. Lawson
909 F.2d 1482 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Lailing Williams v. Fashion Shops of Kentucky, Inc.
905 F.2d 1539 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Bryant v. Carlisle
905 F.2d 1537 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Agristor Leasing v. Mohr
902 F.2d 32 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Levy v. Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp.
893 F.2d 1334 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Rollins v. Tennessee Air Nat. Guard
891 F.2d 292 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Leslie Grable, Marsha K. Blanchard
891 F.2d 293 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
U.S. Auto Finance Co. v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan
889 F.2d 1089 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F.2d 101, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5147, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-b-tanner-company-inc-v-united-states-ca6-1978.