Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 7 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF No. 16-56479 AFRICAN-AMERICAN OWNED MEDIA, a California limited liability company; D.C. No. ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS 2:15-cv-01239-TJH-MAN NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation, ORDER*
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Before: SCHROEDER, M. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
On March 23, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Appellant’s petition for
certiorari, vacated our memorandum disposition filed November 19, 2018, and
remanded for further consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of
African American-Owned Media, 589 U. S. ___ (2020). We hereby VACATE the
district court’s decision and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Comcast.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation (Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.