Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2019·No. 16-56479·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN No. 16-56479 AMERICAN-OWNED MEDIA, a California limited liability company; D.C. No. ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS 2:15-cv-01239- NETWORKS, INC., a California TJH-MAN corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

ORDER

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Filed February 4, 2019

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

2 NAAAOM V. COMCAST

ORDER

The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge M. Smith and Judge Nguyen vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Schroeder so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation, (9th Cir. 2019).

Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation (Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.