Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation
This text of Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation (Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN No. 16-56479 AMERICAN-OWNED MEDIA, a California limited liability company; D.C. No. ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS 2:15-cv-01239- NETWORKS, INC., a California TJH-MAN corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Filed February 4, 2019
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 2 NAAAOM V. COMCAST
ORDER
The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge M. Smith and Judge Nguyen vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Schroeder so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Naaaom v. Comcast Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naaaom-v-comcast-corporation-ca9-2019.