Myrick v. City of Montgomery

304 So. 2d 247, 54 Ala. App. 5, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1155
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 1, 1974
Docket3 Div. 244
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 304 So. 2d 247 (Myrick v. City of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myrick v. City of Montgomery, 304 So. 2d 247, 54 Ala. App. 5, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1155 (Ala. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This appellant was convicted of a breach of a Montgomery ordinance. The particular breach was driving while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage.

In its proof the City relied on the results of a breath test made on an “intoximeter.” This seems to be a machine which uses sophisticated chemo-physical processes to gauge the blood alcoholic content from the output of the lungs of the person tested.

The “Alabama Chemical Test for Intoxication Act,” No. 699 of September 11, 1969,1 § 2, makes certain chemical analyses of, inter alia, a person’s breath admissible in evidence in “civil or criminal” actions. Such analyses carry with them specified rebuttable presumptions. See McCreary v. State, 42 Ala.App. 410, at p. 413, 166 So.2d 914.

The validity of such analyses is conditioned on:

(a) the performance being under a method, or methods; and
(b) by a person with a valid permit;

all as approved by the State Board of Health.

Since this section making the analysis admissible is contrary to Common Law it must, particularly in a criminal case, be strictly construed. Hence, it was incumbent on the City to show:

(1) which test it had designated for its approved officers to administer (§ 1(a) of said Act, 3rd sent.) ; and
(2) that the test and the operator have been approved as required by § 2(b).

The record sub judice fails to show such proof. We pretermit deciding whether or not the limitation of the Act to civil and criminal causes eliminates “quasi-criminal” cases from its field of operation. But see City of Mobile v. McCown Oil Co., 226 Ala. 688, 148 So. 402, which holds that a violation of a city ordinance is not a criminal proceeding.

The judgment below is reversed and this cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caver v. State
533 So. 2d 734 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Nagem v. City of Phenix City
488 So. 2d 1379 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Ex Parte Bush
474 So. 2d 168 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Bush v. City of Troy
474 So. 2d 168 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Harper v. City of Troy
467 So. 2d 269 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Childress v. City of Huntsville
459 So. 2d 1008 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Estes v. State
358 So. 2d 1050 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Pugh v. State
343 So. 2d 793 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Lankford v. Redwing Carriers, Inc.
344 So. 2d 515 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Weaver v. City of Birmingham
340 So. 2d 99 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Chatom v. State
348 So. 2d 828 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Patton v. City of Decatur
337 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
Harbin v. City of Huntsville
333 So. 2d 625 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Holloway v. City of Birmingham
323 So. 2d 726 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Myrick v. CITY OF MONTOGOMERY
304 So. 2d 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)
Myrick v. City of Montgomery
304 So. 2d 247 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 So. 2d 247, 54 Ala. App. 5, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myrick-v-city-of-montgomery-alacrimapp-1974.