Myers v. Zimmer Inc.
This text of Myers v. Zimmer Inc. (Myers v. Zimmer Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2859
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —14)
On October 3, 2018, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 340 F.Supp.3d 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 33 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Paul A. Crotty. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and assigned to Judge Crotty. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Paul A. Crotty. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch 10 Objection is FOR THE PANEL: pening ahs time. the Lf _ CLERK'S OFFICE . eee John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel
A CERTIFIED COPY RUBY‘J. KRAJICK, CLERK. BY 2 | yp L te ih “id
IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2859
SCHEDULE CTO-14 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION
ALASKA AK 3 19-001 16 Archibald et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al ARIZONA AZ 2 19-02472 Jack v. Zimmer Biomet Incorporated et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 19--01466 Myers et al v. Zimmer Inc. et al CONNECTICUT CT 3 19—00339 Kothman v. Zimmer Inc et al OREGON OR 3 19-00512 Sullens v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Myers v. Zimmer Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-zimmer-inc-nysd-2019.