Myers v. State

762 So. 2d 593, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9430, 2000 WL 1022345
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Myers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 761 So. 2d 485
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2000·No. No. 4D00-2227·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief without a hearing. The allegation that appellant’s plea was involuntary because appellant “suffered considerable mental anguish which accelerated cognitive impediments attributable to various negative mental problems suffered by an elderly person” is facially insufficient. See Baker v. State, 404 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (“mental disorder” and other such terms, unrelated to objective symptoms and time and place of trial are mere vague claims and conclusions). Appellant’s allegation that his counsel also suffered mental problems is not related to any claim of ineffectiveness on counsel’s part and is also facially insufficient.

WARNER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 762 So. 2d 593, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9430, 2000 WL 1022345 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

762 So. 2d 593 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
404 So. 2d 1151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)