Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Myers v. State

708 So. 2d 635, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2767, 1998 WL 121782

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 1998

DocketNo. 98-223

StatusPublished

This text of 708 So. 2d 635 (Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. State, 708 So. 2d 635, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2767, 1998 WL 121782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence and the denial of collateral relief. However, we note a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement (correct) and the written judgment (incorrect) of sentence. Appellant was properly sentenced as an habitual offender as [636]*636to Counts I and IV. The judgment saying Counts I thru IV must be corrected.

AFFIRMED as corrected.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence and the denial of collateral relief. However, we note a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement (correct) and the written judgment (incorrect) of sentence. Appellant was properly sentenced as an habitual offender as [636]*636to Counts I and IV. The judgment saying Counts I thru IV must be corrected.

AFFIRMED as corrected.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 So. 2d 635, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2767, 1998 WL 121782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.