Myers v. State

579 So. 2d 924, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5684, 1991 WL 92959
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 1991·No. No. 90-1092·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence of appellant as an habitual offender. However, we remand for correction of the “Order Finding Defendant to be an Habitual Violent Felony Offender.” At the sentencing hearing and on the written sentence, the court found appellant to be only an habitual offender. Therefore, the order enumerating reasons must be corrected to find that the court was sentencing as an habitual offender, not an habitual violent offender.

ANSTEAD, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 579 So. 2d 924, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5684, 1991 WL 92959 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

579 So. 2d 924 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
827 So. 2d 888 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.
780 So. 2d 834 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)