Myers v. State

605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797, 1992 WL 281863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1992·No. No. 91-2311·Published

Opinion

PETERSON, Judge.

Mark A. Myers appeals an order of restitution requiring him to pay $1,109 to the victim of Myers’ grand theft. The restitution order was entered without the eviden-tiary hearing requested by Myers. We quash only paragraph 15 of the July 16, 1991, Order Withholding Adjudication of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation that contained the order of restitution, and remand for a hearing on the amount of damages suffered by the victim. A defendant is entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard on that issue. Gilbert v. State, 600 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Fitzpatrick v. State, 553 So.2d 396 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED in part; QUASHED in part; REMANDED.

COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797, 1992 WL 281863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

605 So. 2d 1019 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzpatrick v. State
553 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Gilbert v. State
600 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)