Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Myers v. State

605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797, 1992 WL 281863

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2311

StatusPublished

This text of 605 So. 2d 1019 (Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. State, 605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797, 1992 WL 281863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PETERSON, Judge.

Mark A. Myers appeals an order of restitution requiring him to pay $1,109 to the victim of Myers’ grand theft. The restitution order was entered without the eviden-tiary hearing requested by Myers. We quash only paragraph 15 of the July 16, 1991, Order Withholding Adjudication of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation that contained the order of restitution, and remand for a hearing on the amount of damages suffered by the victim. A defendant is entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard on that issue. Gilbert v. State, 600 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Fitzpatrick v. State, 553 So.2d 396 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED in part; QUASHED in part; REMANDED.

COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETERSON, Judge.

Mark A. Myers appeals an order of restitution requiring him to pay $1,109 to the victim of Myers’ grand theft. The restitution order was entered without the eviden-tiary hearing requested by Myers. We quash only paragraph 15 of the July 16, 1991, Order Withholding Adjudication of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation that contained the order of restitution, and remand for a hearing on the amount of damages suffered by the victim. A defendant is entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard on that issue. Gilbert v. State, 600 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Fitzpatrick v. State, 553 So.2d 396 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED in part; QUASHED in part; REMANDED.

COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 So. 2d 1019, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797, 1992 WL 281863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack