Myers v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line R.R.

59 Va. Cir. 421, 2002 Va. Cir. LEXIS 434
CourtVirginia Circuit Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 2002
DocketCase No. L99-1444
StatusPublished

This text of 59 Va. Cir. 421 (Myers v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line R.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Virginia Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line R.R., 59 Va. Cir. 421, 2002 Va. Cir. LEXIS 434 (Va. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

By Judge Dean W. Sword, Jr.

The court has reviewed the respective authorities submitted by counsel with regard to the issue of the discovery of surveillance material.

After reviewing the several circuit court opinions, the court comes to the conclusion that the position adopted by Judge Johnson in the matter of Lee v. Richmond F. & P. RR., 23 Va. Cir. 357 (1991), seems fair and meets what the court believes to be a modem approach to discovery.

For the reasons stated by Judge Johnson, we shall require any surveillance materials that may be presented at trial for whatever purpose to be made available for inspection by plaintiff’s counsel at least five days prior to trial. If the defense does not plan to use such materials, the plaintiff has no need to see them and they need not be produced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad
23 Va. Cir. 357 (Virginia Circuit Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 Va. Cir. 421, 2002 Va. Cir. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-norfolk-portsmouth-belt-line-rr-vacc-2002.