Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY
775 N.W.2d 795, 485 Mich. 1015
Opinion
Ronnie L. MYERS and Mary Myers, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Nevada Equipment Liquidating, f/k/a Nevada Equipment, Inc., Michigan Tractor Machinery Company, d/b/a Michigan Cat Aggregate Division, Culver Construction, Inc., f/k/a Culver Consulting, Inc., Defendants, and
Power Screen USA, L.L.C., d/b/a Simplicity Engineering, Inc., D & L Equipment, Inc., and Sublet Contractors, Inc., Defendants, Cross-Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On December 9, 2009, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY, 775 N.W.2d 795, 485 Mich. 1015 (Mich. 2009).
775 N.W.2d 795 (Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lenawee Cty. Bd. of Rd. v. State Auto Prop.
775 N.W.2d 795 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)