Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY

764 N.W.2d 579, 483 Mich. 1002
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2009·No. 137608·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptoiy action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether defendant Muffler Man Supply Company’s alleged negligent act of removing the machine guard was a proximate cause of the injury to plaintiff Ronnie L. Myers. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. Court of Appeals No. 277542.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY, 764 N.W.2d 579, 483 Mich. 1002 (Mich. 2009).

764 N.W.2d 579 (Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Stagger
764 N.W.2d 579 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)