Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY

Michigan Supreme Court

Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY

764 N.W.2d 579, 483 Mich. 1002

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 8, 2009

Docket137608

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 N.W.2d 579 (Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. MUFFLER MAN SUPPLY COMPANY, 764 N.W.2d 579, 483 Mich. 1002 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptoiy action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether defendant Muffler Man Supply Company’s alleged negligent act of removing the machine guard was a proximate cause of the injury to plaintiff Ronnie L. Myers. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. Court of Appeals No. 277542.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptoiy action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether defendant Muffler Man Supply Company’s alleged negligent act of removing the machine guard was a proximate cause of the injury to plaintiff Ronnie L. Myers. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. Court of Appeals No. 277542.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.W.2d 579, 483 Mich. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-muffler-man-supply-company-mich-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack