Myers v. Kaufmann

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2011·No. 10-2237·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2237

HENRY MYERS; JEROME MYERS; GLORIA MYERS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

WALTER R. KAUFMANN; JOSEPH A. BROOM; BETTYE DORN, Ctr. Dir. Activebay,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:10-cv-02081-RMG)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, Gloria Myers, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, and Gloria Myers appeal the

district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Myers v. Kaufmann, No.

0420-2: 2:10-cv-02081-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. Kaufmann, (4th Cir. 2011).

Myers v. Kaufmann (Myers v. Kaufmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.