Myers v. Kaufmann

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2011
Docket10-2237
StatusUnpublished

This text of Myers v. Kaufmann (Myers v. Kaufmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Kaufmann, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2237

HENRY MYERS; JEROME MYERS; GLORIA MYERS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

WALTER R. KAUFMANN; JOSEPH A. BROOM; BETTYE DORN, Ctr. Dir. Activebay,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:10-cv-02081-RMG)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, Gloria Myers, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, and Gloria Myers appeal the

district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Myers v. Kaufmann, No.

0420-2: 2:10-cv-02081-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Myers v. Kaufmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-kaufmann-ca4-2011.