Myers v. Kaufmann
This text of Myers v. Kaufmann (Myers v. Kaufmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2237
HENRY MYERS; JEROME MYERS; GLORIA MYERS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WALTER R. KAUFMANN; JOSEPH A. BROOM; BETTYE DORN, Ctr. Dir. Activebay,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:10-cv-02081-RMG)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, Gloria Myers, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Henry Myers, Jerome Myers, and Gloria Myers appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Myers v. Kaufmann, No.
0420-2: 2:10-cv-02081-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Myers v. Kaufmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-kaufmann-ca4-2011.