MYERS v. Hamilton, Inc.
This text of 407 A.2d 1366 (MYERS v. Hamilton, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion by
In this mandamus action, brought by a landowner, Appellee Hamilton, Inc., against the building inspector and zoning officer of Bensalem Township and the township itself, appellants, to compel the reissuance of building permits revoked by them, the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County overruled appellants’ preliminary objections, which had raised a jurisdictional issue by contending that mandamus is not a proper remedy in the circumstances. The township and its officials have therefore brought this appeal.
We affirm the order of Judge Isaac S. Garb of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, dated June 20, 1978, overruling the preliminary objections, upon Judge Garb’s opinion dated July 14, 1978, of record at No. 78-3468-05-6 in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County.
Order
And Now, this 21st day of September, 1979, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County dated June 20, 1978, overruling preliminary objections, with leave to defendants to file an answer, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 A.2d 1366, 51 Pa. Commw. 504, 1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-hamilton-inc-pacommwct-1979.