Myers v. Addison

159 F. App'x 871
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 2005
Docket04-6381
StatusPublished

This text of 159 F. App'x 871 (Myers v. Addison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Addison, 159 F. App'x 871 (10th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Terry Myers, an Oklahoma state prisoner serving three consecutive 99-year sentences, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) following the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He also seeks to proceed informa pauper-is on appeal. Mr. Myers’s underlying claim is that the Oklahoma state courts have denied his constitutional due process and equal protection rights by denying his request for free copies of his trial transcripts. In his habeas petition, he does not seek a release from custody, but rather an order that the transcripts be provided to him free of cost. The district court assigned the case to a magistrate judge, who provided a thorough analysis of Mr. Myers’s claims and recommended that his petition be denied.

To obtain a COA, a petitioner must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the reasons given in the *872 magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, we conclude that Mr. Myers cannot make such a showing. We therefore DENY his request for a COA and DISMISS this appeal. We also DENY his request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 F. App'x 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-addison-ca10-2005.