Mutual Adjustment Company, Limited v. Chong

33 Haw. 238, 1934 Haw. LEXIS 12
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 1934
DocketNo. 2172.
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Haw. 238 (Mutual Adjustment Company, Limited v. Chong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mutual Adjustment Company, Limited v. Chong, 33 Haw. 238, 1934 Haw. LEXIS 12 (haw 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This casé is before us on the motion of the plaintiff appellee to dismiss the appeal of Lee Sau Chong, defendant, and Chun Yau Chee, interven or. The cause is an action in assumpsit instituted in the circuit court, first judicial circuit, 1933 term. At the conclusion of the trial judgment was entered for plaintiff with the usual order directing that the garnishee, the Dollar Steamship Line Incorporated, Limited, pay to the plaintiff any *239 moneys, etc., due or belonging to the defendant or which might thereafter become due him until the judgment was satisfied. The court discharged W. K. Richardson, the other garnishee, and disallowed the claim of the intervenor, Chun Yau Chee. From this judgment the defendant appellant and the intervenor have brought the cause to this court on a general appeal. It has been universally and repeatedly held in this jurisdiction that review of judgments of circuit courts in law cases may be obtained in this court through the medium of bills of exceptions and writs of error but that a general appeal does not lie in such cases. Carter v. Judge, 16 Haw. 212. See also Marumi v. Bonnell, 29 Haw. 545. The present case is essentially a laiv action, heard and determined in the circuit court.

W. Y. Char for the motion. B. 8. Ulrich contra.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marumi v. Bonnell
29 Haw. 545 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1927)
Territory of Hawaii v. Watanabe Masagi
16 Haw. 196 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Haw. 238, 1934 Haw. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutual-adjustment-company-limited-v-chong-haw-1934.