Mussington v. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

18 F.3d 1033, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 10, 1994·No. No. 1254, Docket 93-7856·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs are individual citizens, three churches, and three church groups who brought suit against St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center (the “Hospital”) and New York state health officials to enjoin the Hospital’s transfer of pediatric, obstetric, and neonatal care services and medical-surgical beds from their present location in a low-income neighborhood with a high minority population to a site located in a higher-income neighborhood with a lower minority population. Plaintiffs claim that the transfer unlawfully discriminates against Medicaid recipients and minorities and therefore violates the Hill-Burton Act, Titles II and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Equal Protection Clause. The district court (Martin, J.) determined that the churches and church groups lack standing and that in any event all of the claims are barred: the claims for injunctive relief by laches and those for damages by the statute of limitations. The court’s opinion is published at 824 F.Supp. 427 (S.D.N.Y.1993) and familiarity with it is assumed. We agree with the district court’s decision that any claims raised in this litigation would be barred by laches or the statute of limitations. We do not reach the other issues raised in the parties’ briefs on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mussington v. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, 18 F.3d 1033, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465 (2d Cir. 1994).

18 F.3d 1033 (Mussington v. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mussington v. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
18 F.3d 1033 (Second Circuit, 1994)