Musarella v. American President Lines Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Musarella v. American President Lines Ltd.

78 A.D.2d 849, 434 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13543

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 849 (Musarella v. American President Lines Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Musarella v. American President Lines Ltd., 78 A.D.2d 849, 434 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 29, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint so as to increase the ad damnum clause. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (see Hillenbrand v 3801 Review Place, 72 AD2d 554). The defendant may, if it be so advised, conduct a further examination before trial and a physical examination of the plaintiff solely with respect to the physical conditions alleged in the plaintiff’s motion papers. Defendant’s time to notice such examinations is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the [850]*850order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Hargett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 29, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint so as to increase the ad damnum clause. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (see Hillenbrand v 3801 Review Place, 72 AD2d 554). The defendant may, if it be so advised, conduct a further examination before trial and a physical examination of the plaintiff solely with respect to the physical conditions alleged in the plaintiff’s motion papers. Defendant’s time to notice such examinations is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the [850]*850order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Hargett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 849, 434 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musarella-v-american-president-lines-ltd-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack