Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.

Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.

72 A.D.2d 554, 420 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13624
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 554 (Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc., 72 A.D.2d 554, 420 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 6, 1978, which denied their motion to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Order reversed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly by respondents and motion granted. Since plaintiffs’ motion to amend is based solely upon an update of original injuries, compliance with the affidavit requirement of London v Moore (32 AD2d 543) was unnecessary (see Church v Catholic Med. Center of Brooklyn & Queens, 52 AD2d 898, 899). Hence, it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the motion on the ground that the affidavit by plaintiffs’ physician failed to establish a causal link between the alleged injury and the accident. Additionally the delay in making the instant motion is not per se an acceptable ground for the denial, in view of the fact that respondents have failed to demonstrate how they would suffer actual prejudice at trial (see Calautti v National Transp. Co., 10 AD2d 955; see, also, Finn v Crystal Beach Tr. Co., 55 AD2d 1001). Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corwise v. Lefrak Organization
93 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Rouen v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
145 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Dolan v. Garden City Union Free School District
113 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Schwartz v. New York City Transit Authority
104 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Kushner v. Queens Transit Corp.
97 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Fahy v. Hertz Corp.
92 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Korolyk v. Blagman
89 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Gottesman v. Beck
88 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Bachtinger v. Yee
85 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Strobel v. Dailey
84 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Beras v. Beras
82 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Musarella v. American President Lines Ltd.
78 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Cardone v. University Hospital
78 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Levine v. City of New York
78 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Carlisle v. County of Nassau
75 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Scarcella v. Dunn
103 Misc. 2d 31 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 554, 420 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillenbrand-v-3801-review-place-inc-nyappdiv-1979.