Murry v. State
77 So. 3d 843, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 159, 2012 WL 75191
Opinion
Mark Murry appeals the summary denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). The trial court, without ordering a State response and without explanation, denied his motion. The State concedes that the record does not refute Murry’s claims. We remand for the trial court either to attach portions of the record which refute his claims or to grant appropriate relief. See Kelly v. State, 36 So.3d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Reversed and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murry v. State, 77 So. 3d 843, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 159, 2012 WL 75191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
77 So. 3d 843 (Murry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. State
36 So. 3d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)