Kelly v. State

36 So. 3d 191, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8648, 2010 WL 2382853
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 2010·No. 4D09-2770·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

POLEN, J.

Appellant, Andrea Kelly, appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying her rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence in which she alleged she was due seventy (70) days credit for time served but was given only forty-seven (47) days credit. The trial court summarily denied the motion stating that Kelly had agreed to be given only forty-seven (47) days credit for time served when she entered a plea agreement with the State. However, the order did not include any record attachments refuting the claim. Seymour v. State, 24 So.3d 794, 794-95 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order summarily denying Kelly’s rule 3.800(a) motion and remand for the trial court to either attach the portions of the record which refute Kelly’s claim or to grant the appropriate relief.

Reversed and remanded.

GROSS, C.J., and STEVENSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 36 So. 3d 191, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8648, 2010 WL 2382853 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

36 So. 3d 191 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murry v. State
77 So. 3d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)