Murray v. Wright
This text of 282 A.D. 855 (Murray v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause of action arose in Orange County.- The record establishes that the convenience of witnesses will be served by having the trial in that county. In the circumstances, the motion for a change of venue should have been granted (Gilliland v. Konta, 206 App. Div. 685 [1st Dept.]; Bode V. Farina, 258 App. Div. 730 [2d Dept.] ; Buckley V. State Bank, 256 App. Div. 939 [2d Dept.]). Order denying defendant’s motion for a change of the place of trial is accordingly reversed on the law and the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Breitel, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Appeal [from order denying defendant’s motion for lease to renew prior motion] unanimously dismissed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 855, 124 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-wright-nyappdiv-1953.