Murray v. Wright

282 A.D. 855, 124 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5203

Opinion

The cause of action arose in Orange County.- The record establishes that the convenience of witnesses will be served by having the trial in that county. In the circumstances, the motion for a change of venue should have been granted (Gilliland v. Konta, 206 App. Div. 685 [1st Dept.]; Bode V. Farina, 258 App. Div. 730 [2d Dept.] ; Buckley V. State Bank, 256 App. Div. 939 [2d Dept.]). Order denying defendant’s motion for a change of the place of trial is accordingly reversed on the law and the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Breitel, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Appeal [from order denying defendant’s motion for lease to renew prior motion] unanimously dismissed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Wright, 282 A.D. 855, 124 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 855 (Murray v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilliland v. Konta
206 A.D. 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Buckley v. State Bank
256 A.D. 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Rock v. Farina
258 A.D. 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)