Gilliland v. Konta

206 A.D. 685
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In the absence of a showing by the plaintiff of the greater convenience of witnesses, the action should be tried in the county where the cause of action arose. (Bell v. Whitehead Brothers Co.,5 App. Div. 555; Osterhout v. Rabe, 39 id. 413; Jacina v. Lemmi, 155 id. 397.) The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, Finch and McAvoy, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilliland v. Konta, 206 A.D. 685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 685 (Gilliland v. Konta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Wright
282 A.D. 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)