Murray v. State

136 S.E. 92, 36 Ga. App. 90, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 779
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 9, 1926·No. 17532·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, and the refusal to grant a new trial was en-or.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodivorth, J., absent on account of illness. Bennett & Bennett, John W. Bennett, for plaintiff in error. W. C. Parker, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. State, 136 S.E. 92, 36 Ga. App. 90, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 779 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

136 S.E. 92 (Murray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ingram v. State
140 S.E. 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)