Ingram v. State
140 S.E. 528, 37 Ga. App. 374, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 688
Opinions
All persons who aid and abet another in the commission of a misdemeanor are guilty as principals. The undisputed evidence in this case demands a finding that the defendant knew that the whisky was in the car which he was driving, and that he aided and abetted Right in transporting and in possessing it. As the verdict [375] was demanded by the evidence, the alleged errors in the charge are immaterial. ,,
Judgment affirmed. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., coneur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingram v. State, 140 S.E. 528, 37 Ga. App. 374, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 688 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
140 S.E. 528 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toney v. State
116 S.E. 550 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Young v. State
132 S.E. 453 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Murray v. State
136 S.E. 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)