Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ingram v. State

140 S.E. 528, 37 Ga. App. 374, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 688

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 16, 1927

Docket18368

StatusPublished

This text of 140 S.E. 528 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingram v. State, 140 S.E. 528, 37 Ga. App. 374, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 688 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Coriam.

All persons who aid and abet another in the commission of a misdemeanor are guilty as principals. The undisputed evidence in this case demands a finding that the defendant knew that the whisky was in the car which he was driving, and that he aided and abetted Right in transporting and in possessing it. As the verdict [375]*375was demanded by the evidence, the alleged errors in the charge are immaterial. ,,

Decided November 16, 1927. M. Price, W. D. Turner, for plaintiff in error. Raymond Pierce, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., coneur.

Luhe, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI