Murray v. Star Paint & Wall Paper Co.

173 P. 721, 103 Wash. 133, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 999
Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 10, 1918·No. No. 14698·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— In this action respondent seeks recovery for personal injuries sustained by him in an automobile collision in Seattle. The case was tried before a jury, which found for defendant. This is an appeal from the order of the court granting respondent a new trial. The lower court is vested with discretion to grant or deny a motion for new trial, and when that judgment is so entered, it will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is shown that there was a manifest abuse of such discretion. Hawn v. Yakima County, 93 Wash. 87, 160 Pac. 7.

The record presenting no such abuse, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Star Paint & Wall Paper Co., 173 P. 721, 103 Wash. 133, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 999 (Wash. 1918).

173 P. 721 (Murray v. Star Paint & Wall Paper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawn v. Yakima County
160 P. 7 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)