Hawn v. Yakima County

160 P. 7, 93 Wash. 87, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1156
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 1916
DocketNo. 13337
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 160 P. 7 (Hawn v. Yakima County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawn v. Yakima County, 160 P. 7, 93 Wash. 87, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1156 (Wash. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order granting a new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. We have held in an unbroken line of decisions that the discretion to so order is vested in the lower court, and that its judgment when so entered will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is a manifest abuse of such discretion. The record presents no such abuse.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntington v. Clallam Grain Co.
27 P.2d 583 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)
Shead v. Riser
239 P. 562 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)
Getty v. Hutton
188 P. 497 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Murray v. Star Paint & Wall Paper Co.
173 P. 721 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Funk v. Horrocks
169 P. 805 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 P. 7, 93 Wash. 87, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawn-v-yakima-county-wash-1916.