Murray v. Rozier

367 S.E.2d 886, 186 Ga. App. 184, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 131
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1988
Docket75174
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 367 S.E.2d 886 (Murray v. Rozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Rozier, 367 S.E.2d 886, 186 Ga. App. 184, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 131 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-defendant has filed this direct appeal from the grant of appellee-plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The grant of a motion for new trial is not a final order from which a direct appeal may be taken. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bishop, 170 Ga. App. 9 (316 SE2d 167) (1984); Days Inn of America v. Sharkey, 178 Ga. App. 718 (344 SE2d 518) (1986). Since appellant did not comply with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur. Ronald B. Thomas, W. Vincent Settle III, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronaldo Ratliff v. Ax Auto, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Barbara Sherrod v. Virginia Helmuth
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Jocelyn Lopez v. Cody E. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
David R. Schmidt v. Kenneth Payne
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018
ROCKDALE AWNING & IRON COMPANY, INC. v. Kerbow
435 S.E.2d 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Boyce v. Murray
395 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 S.E.2d 886, 186 Ga. App. 184, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-rozier-gactapp-1988.