Murray v. Rozier
367 S.E.2d 886, 186 Ga. App. 184, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 131
Opinion
Appellant-defendant has filed this direct appeal from the grant of appellee-plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The grant of a motion for new trial is not a final order from which a direct appeal may be taken. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bishop, 170 Ga. App. 9 (316 SE2d 167) (1984); Days Inn of America v. Sharkey, 178 Ga. App. 718 (344 SE2d 518) (1986). Since appellant did not comply with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murray v. Rozier, 367 S.E.2d 886, 186 Ga. App. 184, 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 131 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).
367 S.E.2d 886 (Murray v. Rozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ronaldo Ratliff v. Ax Auto, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Barbara Sherrod v. Virginia Helmuth
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
HAMDYA ADEM, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ABDALLAH D. ADEM v. ED HELLER
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
Jocelyn Lopez v. Cody E. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
David R. Schmidt v. Kenneth Payne
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018
ROCKDALE AWNING & IRON COMPANY, INC. v. Kerbow
435 S.E.2d 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Boyce v. Murray
395 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)