Murray v. LeRoy Central School District
This text of 491 N.E.2d 1100 (Murray v. LeRoy Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. There was no compliance with the notice of claim requirements of Education Law § 3813— neither substantial compliance with requirements as to form nor strict compliance with the requirements of notice (see, Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 547-548).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 N.E.2d 1100, 67 N.Y.2d 775, 500 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-leroy-central-school-district-ny-1986.