Murray v. LeRoy Central School District

491 N.E.2d 1100, 67 N.Y.2d 775, 500 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17480
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 18, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 491 N.E.2d 1100 (Murray v. LeRoy Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. LeRoy Central School District, 491 N.E.2d 1100, 67 N.Y.2d 775, 500 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17480 (N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. There was no compliance with the notice of claim requirements of Education Law § 3813— neither substantial compliance with requirements as to form nor strict compliance with the requirements of notice (see, Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 547-548).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 32252(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Columna v. Gomez
S.D. New York, 2022
Jones v. City Of New York
S.D. New York, 2021
Arum v. Miller
193 F. Supp. 2d 572 (E.D. New York, 2002)
Kyne v. Carl Beiber Bus Services
147 F. Supp. 2d 215 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Stoetzel v. Wappingers Central School District
166 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
American Tel. & Tel. v. NYC DEPT. OF HUMAN RES.
736 F. Supp. 496 (S.D. New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
491 N.E.2d 1100, 67 N.Y.2d 775, 500 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-leroy-central-school-district-ny-1986.