Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided November 2, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-05499·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT TACOMA 6 MICHELLE L MURRAY, Case No. C19-5499 TLF 7 Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF 8 ATTORNEY’S FEES COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 9 Defendants. 10

11 Plaintiff has filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. 12 23. Plaintiff seeks a total award of $21,169.50 less the amount that was awarded in the 13 EAJA award in the sum of $7,696.43, resulting in a net award of $13,473.07. Id. 14 Defendant does not object to Plaintiff’s request, but brings a minor calculation error to 15 the Court’s attention-the actual amount withheld was $21,144.00; thus, the net fee 16 should be $13,447.57. Dkt. 25. The Court finds plaintiff’s counsel is entitled to fees 17 under Section 406(b) and accordingly GRANTS plaintiff’s motion and ORDERS as 18 follows: 19 (1) Plaintiff is granted attorney fees in the amount of $13,447.57. 20 (2) Subject to any offset allowed under the Treasury Offset Program, as 21 22 23 24 1 discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), payment of this award 2 shall be sent to plaintiff’s attorney Eitan Kassel Yanich at his address: 203 3 Fourth Avenue E., Suite 321, Olympia, WA 98501. 4

5 Dated this 2nd day of November, 2021. 6 7 A 8 Theresa L. Fricke 9 United States Magistrate Judge

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security (Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)