Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD
870 A.2d 1080, 273 Conn. 910
This text of 870 A.2d 1080 (Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD, 870 A.2d 1080, 273 Conn. 910 (Colo. 2005).
Opinion
Karen A. MURPHY et al.
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, in support of the petition.
John W. Mullin, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 147, 860 A.2d 764 (2004), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. Zoning Board of Appeals
860 A.2d 764 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
870 A.2d 1080, 273 Conn. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-of-city-of-stamford-conn-2005.