Murphy v. Shaw

Ninth Circuit

Murphy v. Shaw

253 F.3d 1151, 2001 D.A.R. 5936

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 12, 2001

DocketNo. 97-35989

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 253 F.3d 1151 (Murphy v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Shaw, 253 F.3d 1151, 2001 D.A.R. 5936 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

We remand to the district court to determine in light of the opinion in Shaw v. Murphy, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1475, 149 L.Ed.2d 420 (2001), whether the prison regulations — particularly the rules forbidding insolence and interference with due process hearings — as applied to Murphy in this case are “reasonably related to legiti[1152]*1152mate penological interests” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 79, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987), or vague and overboard as applied to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We remand to the district court to determine in light of the opinion in Shaw v. Murphy, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1475, 149 L.Ed.2d 420 (2001), whether the prison regulations — particularly the rules forbidding insolence and interference with due process hearings — as applied to Murphy in this case are “reasonably related to legiti[1152]*1152mate penological interests” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 79, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987), or vague and overboard as applied to him.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F.3d 1151, 2001 D.A.R. 5936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-shaw-ca9-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack