Murphy v. Rooney

45 Cal. 78
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·No. No. 3,337·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

Upon looking into the record, we are of opinion that the mutual promises of McCloy and Carroll, contained in the written agreement of November, 1865, constitute a sufficient consideration to support the agreement, and so take it out of the eighth section of the Statute of Frauds.

The Court having found the fact that by mistake of the .draftsman some of the terms of the agreement had been omitted in drawing it up, should have entered a decree re[80] forming the instrument in those particulars, and specifically enforcing it as reformed.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings, not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Rooney, 45 Cal. 78 (Cal. 1872).

45 Cal. 78 (Murphy v. Rooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotle v. Miller
334 P.2d 849 (California Supreme Court, 1959)
Commissioners of Lewes v. Breakwater Fisheries Co.
117 A. 823 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1922)
Atwood v. Mikeska Et Ux.
1911 OK 135 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Hughes v. Payne
117 N.W. 363 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
MacOmber v. Peckham
17 A. 910 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1889)