Murphy v. Pound

12 Ga. 278
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1852·No. No. 49·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

By the. Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] This bill was filed by Newman Pound and Martha G. Pound, his wife, to recover of William R. Murphy, a legacy bequeathed to the complainants, by Elizabeth Horne, the grandmother of Mrs. .Pound.

It alleges, that by her will she left to them one-fourth part of her estate, which amounted to some $15,000, or other large sum. The defendant, who was appointed by said will trustee for Mrs. Pound, submitted the will to' the proper Court, where it was proven and admitted to record. No executor was nominated; nor has administration with the will annexed, been granted upon the estate of Mrs. Horne.

It appears from the answer of Murphy, that the will was made for a special purpose, and t&at in carrying it to probate and record, that object would be attained.

Murphy, who resided with the testatrix at the time of her death, took charge of every thing which was in the possession of Mrs. Horne, as the property of the estate of John Horne, her deceased husband, who had given a life interest in it to his wife; but he utterly denied that she owned any estate, to dispose of by her will; moreover, he insisted, that suit could not be maintained against him by the complainants, to compel a distribution of the estate of Elizabeth Horne, if she had any, until it should be represented by the appointment of an administrator, with the will annexed ; that he alone was competent to collect together the estate of the testatrix, and after the payment of her debts, to divide the residue among the legatees.

[280] The Court overruled this plea, and directed the cause to proceed ; which decision was manifestly erroneous. This step is indispensably necessary. This being personal property, no other person but the legal representative of Mrs. Horne is authorized to recover it from the possession of the defendant; and none having been appointed, the legacies could not vest, so as to enable the complainants to maintain their suit, until this is done.

The judgment must be reversed, with instructions to the Court below to dismiss the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Pound, 12 Ga. 278 (Ga. 1852).

12 Ga. 278 (Murphy v. Pound) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fowler v. White
295 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
Flaherty v. Dillon
70 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Holt v. Industrial Life & Health Insurance
186 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Hausauer v. Order of Railway Conductors Home Ass'n
168 S.E. 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Pair v. Pair
95 S.E. 295 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Brown v. Mutual Life Insurance
90 S.E. 856 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Smith v. Smith
81 S.E. 895 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Moughon v. Masterson
79 S.E. 561 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Kytle v. Kytle
57 S.E. 748 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Smith v. Turner
37 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Juhan v. Juhan
30 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Mason v. Atlanta Fire Co. Number 1
70 Ga. 604 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)
Morgan v. Woods
69 Ga. 599 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1882)