Flaherty v. Dillon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Flaherty v. Dillon

70 S.E.2d 377, 209 Ga. 25, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 385

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1952

DocketNo. 17807

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.E.2d 377 (Flaherty v. Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flaherty v. Dillon, 70 S.E.2d 377, 209 Ga. 25, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 385 (Ga. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

We recognize the well-established rule to the effect that, under certain circumstances, the courts of ordinary and equity courts have concurrent jurisdiction over the settlement of accounts of administrators and executors. Code, § 113-2203. It is also true that this court has said generally that, when a [27]*27petition for accounting sets out facts indicating that something would be found to be due the petitioners, the petition is good as against a general demurrer. Southern Feed Stores v. Sanders, 193 Ga. 884 (20 S. E. 2d, 413).

The case here presented is not an application of these rules of law, but is whether or not these plaintiffs can maintain this suit in any event. The'petition in the instant case shows that the estate of Mary Agnes Flaherty is now unrepresented, no one having qualified as executor or executrix. The petition alleges that mortgages and liens exist as against the property of the deceased, which negatives the idea that no administration of the estate is necessary. The effect of the petition is to seek the recovery of property, largely personal, belonging to the deceased in the hands of a person who is not a legal representative of the estate of the deceased, the petition having been filed by the heirsi at law of the deceased. This court has repeatedly held that this can not be done under the circumstances appearing in this petition. Carr v. Berry, 116 Ga. 372 (42 S. E. 726); Murphy v. Pound, 12 Ga. 278; Smith v. Smith, 141 Ga. 629 (81 S. E. 895). It follows, the judgment sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyatt, Justice.

We recognize the well-established rule to the effect that, under certain circumstances, the courts of ordinary and equity courts have concurrent jurisdiction over the settlement of accounts of administrators and executors. Code, § 113-2203. It is also true that this court has said generally that, when a [27]*27petition for accounting sets out facts indicating that something would be found to be due the petitioners, the petition is good as against a general demurrer. Southern Feed Stores v. Sanders, 193 Ga. 884 (20 S. E. 2d, 413).

The case here presented is not an application of these rules of law, but is whether or not these plaintiffs can maintain this suit in any event. The'petition in the instant case shows that the estate of Mary Agnes Flaherty is now unrepresented, no one having qualified as executor or executrix. The petition alleges that mortgages and liens exist as against the property of the deceased, which negatives the idea that no administration of the estate is necessary. The effect of the petition is to seek the recovery of property, largely personal, belonging to the deceased in the hands of a person who is not a legal representative of the estate of the deceased, the petition having been filed by the heirsi at law of the deceased. This court has repeatedly held that this can not be done under the circumstances appearing in this petition. Carr v. Berry, 116 Ga. 372 (42 S. E. 726); Murphy v. Pound, 12 Ga. 278; Smith v. Smith, 141 Ga. 629 (81 S. E. 895). It follows, the judgment sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.E.2d 377, 209 Ga. 25, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flaherty-v-dillon-ga-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack