Murphy v. Mitchell

119 S.E. 424, 30 Ga. App. 736, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 659
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 22, 1923
Docket13832
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 119 S.E. 424 (Murphy v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Mitchell, 119 S.E. 424, 30 Ga. App. 736, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 659 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This being a suit on open account, and the amount of the verdict found for the plaintiff having been reduced by him by writing off a sum specified by the court as a condition precedent to the overruling of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, and it not being made to appear to this court that from the application of the law to the evidence the excess could be definitely and accurately ascertained, the order denying a new7 trial upon this condition wras error. Central &c. Ry. Co. v. Perkerson, 112 Ga. 923 (38 S. E. 365, 53 L. R. A. 210); Lee v. Bagwell, 14 Ga. App. 699 (82 S. E. 49).

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J:, and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City Motor Exchange v. Ballinger
138 S.E.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Quick Tire Service Inc. v. Ball
128 S.E. 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 424, 30 Ga. App. 736, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-mitchell-gactapp-1923.