Murphy v. . MacKey
119 N.E. 1061, 223 N.Y. 612, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1311
This text of 119 N.E. 1061 (Murphy v. . MacKey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murphy v. . MacKey, 119 N.E. 1061, 223 N.Y. 612, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1311 (N.Y. 1918).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Caedozo, McLaughlin and Andbews, JJ., and Hogan, J., under provisions of section 1317 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Dissenting on ground that *613 error was committed in charging requests made by respondents’ counsel: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase and Pound, JJ. _
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Murphy v. . MacKey
119 N.E. 1061 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 N.E. 1061, 223 N.Y. 612, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-mackey-ny-1918.