Murphy v. Holzinger

6 A.D.3d 1073, 775 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6137
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 2004
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 1073 (Murphy v. Holzinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Holzinger, 6 A.D.3d 1073, 775 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, A.J.), entered April 9, 2003. The judgment was entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant Robert F. Ruggles.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted in part, the verdict with respect to defendant Robert F. Ruggles is set aside and a new trial is granted.

Same memorandum as in Murphy v Holzinger (6 AD3d 1072 [2004]). Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Holzinger
6 A.D.3d 1072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.3d 1073, 775 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-holzinger-nyappdiv-2004.